a The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. for Niagara Falls, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
malicious prosecution case, the wrongfully accused plaintiff can recover his or her actual injuries
In a malicious prosecution case, the wrongfully accused plaintiff can recover his or her actual injuries, which include attorneys' fees to defend the underlying case in criminal court, the cost of any bail bond, lost wages, damages for embarrassment and humiliation, and damages for harm to his or her reputation.
In some cases, punitive damages may also be awarded, above and beyond the actual damages suffered, in order to punish the person who raised the wrongful accusations and to discourage others from engaging in similar conduct.
LIVE: Clement on hot seat over G8 spendingTaxation-- PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
AUDITOR GENERAL SAID NO PAPER TRAIL BUT SOMEONE BROKE THE RULES MAYORS MAKE UP PAPERWORK FOR TREASURY BOARD new public washrooms in towns nowhere near the summit site in Huntsville, Ont., Minister Baird said every dollar was accounted for......BUT NO PAPERWORK TO BACK UP HIS CLAIM
When Canada hosted the Group of Eight leaders in June of last year, Clement was serving as the federal industry minister, while Baird was then handling the transport portfolio for the Conservative government.
Clement was serving as the federal industry minister, while Baird was then handling the transport portfolio for the Conservative government.
Baird signed off on the legacy projects that went ahead, but Clement was managing the $50-million fund the government created for legacy spending.
Controversy arose when it was revealed that legacy monies also came from a border infrastructure fund. The legacy projects included building gazebos, outdoor toilets, new sidewalks and freshening up landscaping in Huntsville, the Muskoka town where leaders met.
A subsequent investigation by the auditor general found that the government did not have documentation to explain why it approved 32 beautification projects. The same investigation concluded that public servants were largely left out of the selection process, leaving Baird to approve projects that Clement recommended.
Since the auditor general's report was released in the summer, the NDP have subsequently obtained emails suggesting that Clement dealt with projects in his constituency office, rather than his ministry office.
PAPERWORK WAS NOT PERFECT BECAUSE IT DOESN'T EXSIST?
The G8 Legacy Infrastructure Fund committed $50 million to Clement's Parry Sound-Muskoka riding for its hosting of the meeting of world leaders in the summer of 2010. The money was used for a variety of projects, some nowhere near the summit site in Huntsville, Ont., including a community centre expansion worth $16.7 million, new sidewalks, gazebos and other outdoor furniture, landscaping and new public washrooms in towns throughout the riding.
federal industry minister
Auditor general raised concerns In her last report released soon after she retired in the spring, former auditor general Sheila Fraser reported that money for the legacy fund was diverted from a border infrastructure fund without MPs knowing. When they approved $83 million for the border fund, they had no idea $50 million was being used to pay for 32 projects in Clement’s riding.The government didn’t tell Parliament it was approving $50 million for a G8 legacy fund that doled out cash for projects in cabinet minister Tony Clement's riding based on his advice, according to the auditor general, who could find no paper trail to explain how the projects were chosen.
ere to edit.
Legislative jurisdiction—"B.N.A. Act, 1867," s. 92. On July 2, 2008, the United Steelworkers signed an agreement to merge with the United Kingdom and Ireland based union, Unite, to form a new global union entity called Workers Uniting.
make the Conservative Party of Canada INDUSTRY CANADA/CRA WELFARE QUEENS reimburse the country.
Commissioner for OATHS in and for the PROVINCE OF ALBERTA
Crimes of moral turpitude relate to conduct that is inherently base, vile, or depraved, contrary to social standards of morality and done with a reckless, malicious, or evil intent.
1989-2009 transfer of alberta ponzie land corruption, conspiracy to corrupt and acquiring and transferring criminal property.
The current International President of the United Steelworkers is Leo Gerard, who has served as president since 2001.
in June 2006, the USW announced the formation of a 'Blue-Green Alliance' with the Sierra Club, which is the largest grassroots environmental organization in the United States
Canadian Steelworkers /Sierra Club, The United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (United Steelworkers or USW) is the largest industrial labor union in North America, with 705,000 members.[1]
Strategic alliances In addition to mergers, the USW has also formed strategic alliances with several other unions as well as other groups. In April 2005, the USW and the Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA) announced that they had formed a strategic alliance to take on the globalization of the culture industry and to address a range of common issues.[4] In July 2006, the USW announced a similar arrangement with the United Transportation Union (UTU), to address common issues in the transportation industry, including the globalization of the industry.[5] In July 2007, the USW inked yet another strategic alliance with the Canadian Region of the Communications Workers of America .[6]
Beyond its affiliations with other unions, in June 2006, the USW announced the formation of a 'Blue-Green Alliance' with the Sierra Club, which is the largest grassroots environmental organization in the United States. The goal of this new partnership is to pursue a joint public policy agenda reconciling workers' need for good jobs with all people's need for a cleaner environment and safer world.[7]
SOVERIEGN CITIZENS MOVEMENT HONOURABLE ALBERTA QUEENS BENCH COURT
Has the trust issued promissory notes to beneficiaries?
Trust beneficiaries are frequently paid through the issuance of a promissory note
US MAXIMUS CONTRACT IN BC SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY CANCELLED
1974-2011 when courts facilitate fraud
In a typical free-riding scheme, a trader sells a company's shares in one brokerage account, and "covers" that trade by buying the same shares in an account at a different brokerage. This trader attempts to profit from short-term price fluctuations without placing personal assets at risk.
a typical free-riding schemeraised money by falsely telling investors to expect high returns, only to spend the bulk of the funds on personal expenses such as limousines, luxury hotel rooms and adult entertainment clubs, or to repay other investors in a "Ponzi-scheme" fashion ["Succession Duties Act".
Succession duties—Partnership property—Owners not domiciled in Province—Interest of deceased partner—R.S.B.C. 1911, c. 217, s. 5, s.—s. la--Taxation—Legislative jurisdiction—"B.N.A. Act, 1867," s. 92.
.By section 5 of the "Succession Duties Act". of British Columbia (R.S.B.C. [1911] ch. 217), on the death of any person his property in the province "and any interest therein or income therefrom * * * passing by will or intestacy" is subject to succession duty whether such person was domiciled in the province or elsewhere at the time of his death.
M. B. and his brother were partners doing business in Ontario and owning timber limits in British Columbia. The firm had no place of business nor man of business in that province and never worked the limits. The partnership articles provided: "8. If either partner shall die during the continuance of the partnership his executors and administrators shall be entitled to the value of his share in the partnership assets. 9. On the expiration or other determination of the said partnership a valuation of the assets shall be made and after providing for payment of liabilities the value of such property stock and credits shall be divided equally between the partners, etc."
M. B. having died while the partnership existed his share in the partnership assets passed by his will to executors. The Province of British Columbia claimed that his interest in the timber limits was subject to succession duty.
Last updated July 26,2011 CRA Obtains Order for Municipal Records The Canada Revenue Agency, CRA, obtained a court order requiring municipalities in Quebec to provide records of all municipal contracts awarded.
They will then audit recipients of funds to ensure that all revenue has been reported. Any person or corporation who has not reported all of their income can file a voluntary disclosure (tax amnesty application) prior to being investigated by CRA. This will avoid prosecution and penalties.
The City of Campbell River2011-12 Director at Large CLAIRE MOGLOVE, Councillor, City of Campbell River
graduate fron university of Manitoba-JUDICIAL SOVEREIGN LAW SCHOOL
Association of Vancouver Island and Coastal Communities (AVICC) The Association of Vancouver Island and Coastal Communities (AVICC) is the longest established area association under the umbrella of the Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM). The area association was established in 1950. It now has a membership of 51 municipalities and regional districts that stretch from the Central Coast Regional District down to the tip of Vancouver Island and include Powell River and the Sunshine Coast. The Association deals with issues and concerns that affect large urban areas to small rural communities.
The basic procedure is as follows. A bank decides to foreclose on a property. Sometimes for legitimate reasons, at other times in error. Then they bring the case to court. In a normal repossession of property, the plaintiff has to show that they actually have a claim on the property. Once you show that you have standing and the defendant has defaulted, you can repossess the property. That’s the foundation of the law: show you have a legitimate claim and then show default.
What has now become clear is that banks are unable to legitimately claim that they have standing in a vast majority. In other words, they can’t show that they actually own the loan any more and therefore have no standing in a foreclosure cases. The reason is that banks were in a rush to sell mortgages and bundle them into securities. The paperwork is so shoddy that no one can tell who legitimately owns a loan anymore. This isn’t a case of losing some paperwork. It is a case of not knowing who legitimately owns the loan.
It is now clear that banks are now clearly involved in massive fraud. As Taibbi reports, banks are obviously doctoring paperwork, which is simply forgery and fraud. Even a non-lawyer can tell the paper work is doctored: mortgages sold to banks that don’t exist anymore; loans sold that were already default (which is illegal); purchase and sell dates that make no sense; paper work changing between court hearings; etc. The shameful thing is that the courts simply don’t care. They give banks multiple chances to “correct” paperwork.
At this point, all I can conclude is that courts have become accomplices in fraud. Perhaps the Florida “rocket docket” court is an extreme case, but it seems endemic to the system. Taibbi notes that nearly all third party investigation reveals massive documentation problems. Rather than let private business sort out the mess it has made, courts are allowing banks to manufacture paperwork for loans they may have sold off or that were illegally sold off.
One can rightly complain about greedy borrowers, but there is an even deeper issue here: the rule of law. Anybody who believes in free markets or good government must agree that the basic principles of law must be applied. You must own the loan and have it properly documented. Courts should come down hard on those who push fraudulent paperwork. Otherwise, the courts become hustlers in robes. orgtheory.nethttp://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2010/11/17/when-courts-facilitate-fraud/
Biggest BC/ALBERTA PONZIE SCAM in COMMONWEALTH judicial history
This somewhat archaic definition generally relates to the following crimes: garnishee QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA
BC ATTORNEY GENERALS MINISTRY CROWN PROSECUTORS :IE CAMPBELL RIVER LEGAL AID SOCIETY FORGED debts, FORGED obligations or FORGED liabilities in the garnishee's hands
One can rightly complain about greedy borrowers, but there is an even deeper issue here: the rule of law. Anybody who believes in free markets or good government must agree that the basic principles of law must be applied. You must own the loan and have it properly documented. Courts should come down hard on those who push fraudulent paperwork. Otherwise, the courts become hustlers in robes. orgtheory.nethttp://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2010/11/17/when-courts-facilitate-fraud/
Biggest BC/ALBERTA PONZIE SCAM in Wall Street history FORGING FORGED DEBTORS CONSENT TO PAY THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND a endless mortgage debt.
, If your loan has been assigned to the QUEEN that MERS (mortgage electronic registration system ) the SECURITIZATION is most likely ILLEGAL if US Maximus was involved!
FOUNDING PONZIE CONTRACT PLAYERS VICTIMS LEGAL COUNSEL attorney's actions caused damages, and that she failed in her duty to represent the victim.Canada's Judicial mafia protect criminals . Bruce Macfarlane QC now made a Professor LAW Faculty Univ of Manitoba. HOW TO FRAME INNOCENT CITIZENS see Law Journal 2006
the 1974 crown skeleton in the closet of our commonwealth legal-system... cases where innocent people are convicted."Taxation—Legislative jurisdiction—"B.N.A. Act, 1867," s. 92.
Federal Child Support Guidelines ( Regulations are current to 2011-10-04 and last amended on 2009-06-11
ELEMENTS OF A CHILD SUPPORT ORDER Form of payments
11. The court may require in a child support order that the amount payable under the order be paid in periodic payments, in a lump sum or in a lump sum and periodic payments.
Split custody
8. Where each spouse has custody of one or more children, the amount of a child support order is the difference between the amount that each spouse would otherwise pay if a child support order were sought against each of the spouses.
Court Order Enforcement Act [RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 78
Barristers ActR.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER B.3
Crown Counsel
(5) Nothing in this Act affects or alters any rights of precedence that appertain to any member of the bar when acting as counsel for Her Majesty, or for any attorney general of Her Majesty, in any matter depending in the name of Her Majesty or of the attorney general before the courts, but such right and precedence remain as if this Act had not been passed. R.S.O. 1990, c. B.3, s. 3 (5).
Debts bound from time of service of order 9 (1) Service of a copy of an order that states that debts, obligations or liabilities owing, payable or accruing due to the defendant, judgment debtor or person liable to satisfy the judgment or order are attached or notice of it to the garnishee in a manner the judge or registrar directs, binds the debts, obligations or liabilities in the garnishee's hands from the time of service or notice.
(2) A copy of the garnishing order must be served at once, or within a time allowed by the judge or registrar by memorandum endorsed on the order, on the defendant, judgment debtor or person liable to satisfy the judgment or order.
(3) An order must not be made for payment to the plaintiff or judgment creditor of money paid into court by the garnishee, as provided in section 21, until service of the copy has been proved by affidavit filed.
(4) A copy of a garnishing order issued out of the Provincial Court in respect of a proceeding under the Small Claims Act may be served by mailing a copy to the person to be served by registered mail to the last known post office address of that person.
(5) If it is made to appear to a judge or registrar that prompt personal service of the order on the defendant, judgment debtor or person liable to satisfy the judgment or order cannot be effected, the judge or registrar may make an order for substituted or other service, or for the substitution of notice for service, by letter, public advertisement or otherwise, as may be just.