Its time this MalAdministration Cease and Desist..
Creditor of the United States of America and All Debtor Nations CRIMINAL AGENT OF THE CROWN a double agent, working for a US intelligence organization; - claimed to be a CRA AUDITOR
TRUST COLLATERAL was used without Authorization by George H.W. Bush as the President, James Baker III, Alan Greenspan Chm. Fed. R. Banking, Nicholas Brady at the U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, William J. Clinton, Mark Rich, etals and his Advisors all used this TRUST collateral in the worlds most horrific MONEY LAUNDERING SCAM designed to bankrupt the opposing Banking Cartels, and it backfired..
These presidents have no CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY to sell off or give away PUBLIC PROPERTY, our highways, waterways, byways...or even skyways.. They have no such authority granted, vested or enumerated by Constitution..or in a single one of the SEVEN ARTICLES OF LAW stated in the Constitution of the United States.
the abuses of power of the Bush administration From warrantless wiretapping to secret financial data mining to the CIA's rogue operations, he has shown again and again that the executive branch has dangerously overreached, repudiated checks and balances on its power, and maintained secrecy even with its allies in Congress 175 secret CALGARY ALBERTA CONDO ACCOUNTS BONAVENTURE COURT TORONTO DOMINION CIBC BMO RBC
CIA bank accounts;
175 secret CALGARY ALBERTA CONDO ACCOUNTS BONAVENTURE COURT Jason Kenney
Portfolio Minister for Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism
Religion Roman Catholic Jason T. Kenney, PC, MP (born May 30, 1968) is Canada's current Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism. He has represented the riding of Calgary Southeast in the Canadian House of Commons since 1997.
Following the Conservative victory in the 2006 general election, Kenney was appointed Parliamentary Secretary for the Prime Minister of Canada. On January 4, 2007, he was sworn in as the Secretary of State for Multiculturalism and Canadian Identity, and as a Privy Councillor. Kenney has held the post of Minister for Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism since October 30, 2008.
He studied philosophy at the St. Ignatius Institute of the University of San Francisco, a Jesuit university in San Francisco, California. While there, he sat on the governing board of the Associated Students Group. In the Spring of 1990, after a student at the University of San Francisco School of Law, Laurie Moore, had won a challenge allowing her and others to distribute pro-choice literature on campus, Kenney stated to a CNN reporter that "The pro-choice group, which is politically activating to legalize abortion-on-demand on this campus, while using campus facilities, is essentially destroying the mission and the purpose of the university." Kenney and others later petitioned the archbishop of San Francisco to drop the word "Catholic" from the university's name, in an effort to pressure the institution to ban the pro-choice group from campus.[2][3]
He dropped out before completing his undergraduate degree to begin work in Saskatchewan provincial politics.
[edit] Early career Kenney was originally a member of the Saskatchewan Liberal Party, and in 1988 he served as an executive assistant to Ralph Goodale, who at that time was party leader. Kenney later served a term as Executive Director of the Saskatchewan Taxpayers Association, and later as President and CEO of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, a political advocacy organization. Kenney has never worked in the private sector.
He has also served as a volunteer director for several non-profit and political organizations. These include the Catholic Civil Rights League and the National Foundation for Family Research.
VATICAN CITY/MILAN, March 19 (Reuters) – JP Morgan Chase is closing the Vatican bank’s account with an Italian branch of the U.S. banking giant because of concerns about a lack of transparency at the Holy See’s financial institution, Italian newspapers reported.
The move is a blow to the Vatican’s drive to have its bank included in Europe’s “white list” of states that comply with international standards against tax fraud and money-laundering.
The bank, formally known as the Institute for Works of Religion (IOR), enacted major reforms last year in an attempt to get Europe’s seal of approval and put behind it scandals that have included accusations of money laundering and fraud.
… The financial newspaper, which gave the number of the IOR account, said some 1.5 billion euros passed through it in about 18 months. It said the account was a “sweeping facility,” meaning that it was emptied out at the end of each day with funds transferred to another IOR account in Germany
growing size and complexity of the bets held by the bank’s chief investment office as early as 2007
Top investment bank executives raised concerns about the growing size and complexity of the bets held by the bank’s chief investment office as early as 2007, according to interviews with half a dozen current and former bank officials. Within the investment office, led by Ina Drew, who resigned on Monday, the bets were directed by the head of the Europe trading desk in London, Achilles Macris.
U.S. District Court For the District of
Hawaii CV05-00030 DAE KSC Patriot; wife of murdered Colonel Russell Herrman who was in charge of overseeing approximately 175 secret CIA bank accounts;
United States Patriot; wife of murdered Colonel Russell Herrman who was in charge of overseeing approximately 175 secret CIA bank accounts; activist and advocate for First Amendment Rights and bringing the criminals and traitors in the U.S. government to justice; Service Provider for Interpol, Global Victim Banking, CIA, FBI, BATF, Homeland Defense, US Congress, and Senate, and all US Banking, US
Firm Profile The firm focuses on federal criminal trials, appeals, grand jury proceedings, and other criminal investigations. We also handle congressional investigations, internal investigations, a broad range of agency investigations (such as SEC enforcement actions and investigations conducted by Offices of Inspector General), matters in the Supreme Court of the United States, and other diverse litigation and trial proceedings. The firm's principals have broad experience representing clients in federal criminal cases involving classified information. Our breadth of knowledge and experience informs every representation we undertake.
Our criminal practice covers a wide spectrum of statutes and regulations. Current or past matters have involved alleged violations of the securities laws (including insider trading); the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; health care laws; export control laws; the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering regulations; environmental statutes and regulations; campaign finance and other public corruption laws; anti-kickback statutes; government contracting laws; antitrust law; immigration statutes; the Internal Revenue Code; laws governing money laundering and currency transactions; the Foreign Agents Registration Act; laws prohibiting the obstruction of justice; and myriad other criminal statutes and regulations. The scope of past and current civil matters has been similarly broad.
increasingly large investments involving ILLEGAL CROWN ESTATES/TRUSTS/NOT FOR PROFITS complex trades that were hard to understand contributed to the bank’s lowering its guard. .
In the years leading up to JPMorgan Chase’s $2 billion trading loss, risk managers and some senior investment bankers raised concerns that the bank was making increasingly large investments involving complex trades that were hard to understand. But even as the size of the bets climbed steadily, these former employees say, their concerns about the dangers were ignored or dismissed.
An increased appetite for such trades had the approval of the upper echelons of the bank, including Jamie Dimon, the chief executive, current and former employees said.
Initially, this led to sharply higher investing profits, but they said it also contributed to the bank’s lowering its guard.
the bets were directed by the head of the Europe trading desk in London,
Achilles Macris.
David Olson, who headed up credit trading for the chief investment office until December, said that in his trading “the management was very involved and the risk controls were very strong.”
Part of the breakdown in supervision, current executives said, was a fundamental disconnect between the chief investment office in London and the rest of the bank. Even within the chief investment office there were heightening concerns that the bets being made in London were incredibly complex and not fully understood by management in New York.
Despite these concerns, the scope of the chief investment’s offices trades widened sharply following the acquisition of Washington Mutual at the height of the financial crisis in 2008. Not only did the bank bring with it hundreds of billions more in assets, it also owned riskier securities that needed to be hedged against. As a result, the business’s investment securities portfolio rapidly grew, more than quadrupling to $356 billion in 2011, from $76.5 billion in 2007, company filing show.
Ms. Drew made presentations to the board about twice a year, one former executive recalled, “but it was just not talked about a lot,” he said.
no Jurisdiction
CIA has no Jurisdiction within the borders of the US (they only spy on our foreign enemies / allies)
The FBI, is the investigative bureau of the government, they investigate crimes that may have been committed.
The U.S. Marshals have similar rights to the FBI (in regards to there ability to cross state borders), but do not investigate, they function as a transportation service and capturing services for convicted felons etc.
There is no 'supreme authority' each department has different roles to play in the enforcement role of the government.
numerous criminal activities mail fraud and bank fraud and false insurance claims in
addition to a civil judgment against its Chief Financial Officer.
Criticism An audit by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) (November 2010) of the Justice Department found "weaknesses in the USMS's efforts to secure federal court facilities in the six USMS district offices we visited".[26]
The report found, among other things, that the USMS Judicial Security
Division had contracted private security firms to provide CSOs (Court Security Officers) without having completed background checks. Another
incident involved the USMS awarding a $300 million contract to a firm that had a known history of numerous criminal activities leading to convictions for mail fraud and bank fraud and false insurance claims in addition to a civil judgment against its Chief Financial Officer.
The Marshals Service is part of the executive branch of government, and is the enforcement arm of the United States federal courts. The U.S. Marshals are responsible for the protection of court officers and buildings and the effective operation of the judiciary. The service also assists with court security and prisoner transport, serves arrest warrants, and seeks fugitives.
Specialized units
Specialized units [edit] Special Operations Group (SOG) The Special Operations Group (SOG) is a specially trained and highly disciplined tactical unit of the US Marshals Service. It is a self-supporting response team capable of responding to emergencies anywhere in the United States or its territories. Most of the deputy marshals who have volunteered to be SOG members serve as full-time deputies in Marshals Service offices throughout the nation, and they remain on call 24 hours a day for SOG missions. The SOG also maintains a small, full-time operational cadre stationed at the Marshals Service Tactical Operations Center at Camp Beauregard, LA. There, all SOG deputies undergo extensive, specialized training in tactics and weaponry. These deputies must meet rigorous physical and mental standards. The group's missions include: apprehending fugitives; protecting dignitaries; providing court security; transporting high-profile and dangerous prisoners; providing witness security; and seizing assets.
Training Division W. Fallon, Assistant Director 912-267-2505
Common-Law Victims
DURHAM TRUST ESTATES
'Paper terrorism' isn't just on paper
For Karen Mathews, a California county court recorder viciously attacked by an antigovernment common-law zealot, the fear never ends.
Mathews — whose "crime" was to refuse to remove IRS liens on a common-law court member's property — carries a handgun at all times. She's had training in martial arts. She's been threatened, had bullets fired through her office windows, discovered a fake bomb planted under her car, and opened a package sent to her enclosing a single bullet and a chilling note: "The next bullet will be directed to your head."
Soon, she faces more surgery to repair serious injuries received during the attack four years ago in her Modesto garage. Mathews was severely beaten and stabbed, her legs were slashed with a knife and she was sodomized with a gun.
Now, she fears, it's happening again.
Unlike some officials who have decided to call it quits in the face of common-law terror, Mathews stayed on at her once obscure job as elected recorder of Stanislaus County courts. Her reward? Another angry man with links to the common-law movement has filed a civil suit against her.
"These yahoos still come into my office," Mathews sighs, even though her attacker and the Juris Christian Assembly members who paid him drew lengthy prison sentences. "I never know when one of them might decide, 'Let's finish her off.'"
When common-law "courts" and related pseudo-legal bodies began appearing in large numbers in the early 1990s, officials were concerned but not panicked. After all, most reasoned, these courts were involved only in "paper terrorism" — the filing of bogus property liens, warrants, writs and other documents.
Occasionally, the courts found officials guilty of "treason," but none of the "capital" convictions were enforced.
Judges Take Up the Gun But much has changed in the last few years.
Death threats have been delivered to judges, prosecutors, recorders and other officials. Leaders of the Republic of Texas, a common-law separatist group, shot their way into a neighboring couple's home, seriously injuring the man. Armed common-law court members marched into a real court in Montana, while others threatened to hang a local official from a bridge.
A common-law leader in Ohio threatened a police officer with a gun after a routine traffic stop, only to be shot down himself.
"Judges are intensely aware of security now," says Elizabeth Francis, a political scientist and one of the authors of a national survey of 431 state and local judges conducted for the University of Nevada.
"Preliminary studies showed up to a third of them carry firearms [because of common-law threats]. The whole phenomenon could have a chilling effect on people's desire to be judges."
A whopping 55 percent of state and local judges reported encounters with apparent common-law advocates who challenged their authority. Many of these challengers went beyond belligerence. Twelve percent physically threatened the judges; 30 percent sued them in real courts; and 13 percent filed bogus liens against the judges' property.
"There's a strong sense of spread" of common-law activities, Francis says. "It isn't just Montana, Idaho, Texas and New Mexico any more. It is nationwide."
At the same time, a survey by the U.S. Marshals Service shows threats against federal judicial officials have skyrocketed, from 271 in 1996 to 612 in 1997. The growth was apparently largely driven by common-law activity.
The survey found that Florida ranked top in the nation last year, with 59 threats against judicial officials reported to the Marshals Service. Other leading states were California (52); Washington, D.C. (46); Texas (35); New York (34); Illinois and Pennsylvania (21); Michigan (20), and Georgia and Washington (15).
The damage, particularly the financial damage, has not been limited to officials. Hundreds of people, if not thousands, have had to pay thousands of dollars to clear false property liens filed by common-law advocates. (Even liens with no legal basis can be filed easily in most jurisdictions, although this is changing.
The liens cloud legal titles, making it impossible to sell property such as homes or cars until they're cleared.) The liens typically are filed against those seen as enemies by common-law advocates.
Witness Security Program ESTATE DEBT NIGHTMARE VKD DURHAM DISEASE FRANKLIN
The U.S. Marshals Service provides for the security, health and safety of government witnesses, and their immediate dependents, whose lives are in danger as a result of their testimony against drug traffickers, terrorists, organized crime members and other major criminals.
The Witness Security Program was authorized by the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 and amended by the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984. The U.S. Marshals have protected, relocated and given new identities to more than 8,300 witnesses and 9,800 of their family members, since the program began in 1971.
The successful operation of this program is widely recognized as providing a unique and valuable tool in the government’s battle against major criminal conspirators and organized crime.
Witnesses and their families typically get new identities with authentic documentation. Housing, subsistence for basic living expenses and medical care are provided to the witnesses. Job training and employment assistance may also be provided.
The U.S. Marshals provide 24-hour protection to all witnesses, while they are in a high-threat environment including pretrial conferences, trial testimonials and other court appearances.
No Witness Security Program participant, who followed security guidelines, has been harmed while under the active protection of the U.S. Marshals.
In both criminal and civil matters involving protected witnesses, the U.S. Marshals cooperate fully with local law enforcement and court authorities to bring witnesses to justice or to have them fulfill their legal responsibilities. http://www.usmarshals.gov/witsec/index.html
FALSE FLAG
The GBI started a task force to monitor the rise of sovereign citizen activity throughout Georgia.
OTTAWA - Canadian security could be compromised as companies do business with a massive Chinese tech firm, warns an intelligence expert.
Australia and the United States refuse to allow companies to deal with China’s Huawei Technologies due to security concerns, but Canadian firms Bell and Telus have recently signed agreements with the tech giant.
“(The government) have been ignoring some very, very important warnings,” said Michel Juneau-Katsuya, a former manager for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.
Juneau-Katsuya said Canada’s allies may have second thoughts about sharing government information through our communications systems because of the deal with Huawei.
“This way of doing business is counter-logical,” he said. “It goes against the logic of our allies.
“It goes against the logic of security, basic security ... we are talking about evidence that has been collected by our allies.”
The Conservative government has been working to warm relations with China for years but opposition parties say dealing with companies like Huawei is risky business.
“Huawei will be allowed to buy up key telecommunications assets here in Canada despite the fact that the United States and Australia have blocked it from major telecom projects due to serious national security concerns,” NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair said. “The United States and Australia are two of our closest allies. They still see the risk. Why did the prime minister choose to ignore their warnings?”
Prime Minister Stephen Harper defended the government’s stance Tuesday, stating Canada does not “take dictates on security from the United States.”
“The leader of the NDP is speaking of some contractual relationships between some Canadian companies and foreign companies,” Harper said. “The particular concerns that he raised in fact have been addressed. Those concerns were examined and those concerns have been addressed in our mind.”